经济与社会研究院SEMINAR第57期

发布单位:人文社科咨询服务管理中心 [2017-09-05 16:57:55] 打印此信息

题目: Investment and Structural Transformation: the Case of China

报告人:郭凯明

时间:20179813:30-15:00

地点:暨南大学中惠楼106B会议室

主办方:暨南大学经济与社会研究院

  

主讲人简介:

郭凯明,中山大学岭南学院经济学系副教授,博士生导师。2012年获得北京大学光华管理学院经济学博士学位,2007年获得南京大学商学院管理学学士学位。研究成果发表于Economics of Transition, 经济研究、世界经济等国内外期刊。研究领域为结构转型、经济增长、人口发展、中国宏观经济。

  

Abstract: The decline in manufacturing has accelerated the rise of service during the recent decades in many countries including China. We propose investment-specific technological change as a new and fundamental force behind the process of structural transformation and particularly the rise of services, motivated by the facts that sectoral composition of investment is dramatically different from that of consumption and follows a secular trend with rising share of services and declining shares of agriculture and manufacturing. To assess whether the mechanism of investment is quantitatively important, we develop a standard model of structural transformation by incorporating an investment production function which employs output from the three broad sectors as inputs, and apply it to China's experience. Sectoral composition of investment in China moves towards services and away from agriculture and manufacturing during 1981-2014, with the investment rate at a high level of around 40 percent. We confirm that changes in sectoral composition of investment cannot be explained by the relative price of inputs alone. Investment-specific technological change that shifts the investment demandfrom agricultural and manufacturing goods to services is an important force. It substantially influences the process of structural transformation, and is particularly an important contributor to the catch-up of services since 2000. We also find that TFP growth in manufacturing is an alternative factor that affects sectoral composition of investment, which in turn decreases the share of manufacturing and increases the share of services. A model attributing all investment to manufacturing as commonly adopted in existing literature is misspecified for China. We suggest that for China and other emerging markets that must maintain high investment rate to catch up with the advanced economies, policies should be designed to upgrade sectoral composition of investment to boost the development of services.